On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:31:50 -0400, Rjack wrote: >> So far as I can tell this thought process lumps the GPL in with all >> other EULA on the one hand, and then differentiates on the other, but >> only when convenient. > > Why? Every EULA (contract) is written differently and should be subject > to somewhat uniform rules of contract interpretation depending upon what > jurisdiction you reside.
EULA should be subject to somewhat uniform rules? If you break an EULA with Microsoft, what would be the result versus breaking an EULA (the GPL) with Redhat? I've seen no reason why either scenario would that different. -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
