RonB stated in post grrlk7$64...@news.motzarella.org on 4/11/09 8:01 PM: > Rahul Dhesi wrote: >> Rjack still hasn't specified which of the terms in the GPL are illegal. >> And he protests: >> >>> Not at all. Try reading my posts instead of denying and lying. >> ... >>> You been told many, many times. Review past posts I've made instead of >>> just denying and lying. >> >> OK, readers, I need your assistance here. >> >> I admit that I have not read everything that Rjack has ever posted. >> Nor, I suspect, has anybody else, with the possible exception of >> amicus_curious. But in the sample that I did read, I have not seen Rjack >> ever specify exactly what in the GPL is illegal. For a short while I >> thought he was referring to antitrust, but not, he said he was not. >> >> Has anybody seen any specific description from Rjack in his posts that >> tells us what in the GPL is illegal? > > I killfiled Rjack shortly after his first message showed up. I have no > idea what he's yammering on about -- but I'm guessing he's pretty much a > crank in the "Snit mode." It doesn't matter how convincing your argument > might be -- he'll just rewind and re-spew -- starting the whole thing > all over again. > > That's the crank way. Best to just killfile him.
LOL! You imply that you made reasoned arguments in response to my comments. Hey, I bet you that you cannot find a single example. And you *know* I am right. -- [INSERT .SIG HERE] _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss