RonB <[email protected]> writes: > Rahul Dhesi wrote: >> Rjack still hasn't specified which of the terms in the GPL are illegal. >> And he protests: >> >>> Not at all. Try reading my posts instead of denying and lying. >> ... >>> You been told many, many times. Review past posts I've made instead of >>> just denying and lying. >> >> OK, readers, I need your assistance here. >> >> I admit that I have not read everything that Rjack has ever posted. >> Nor, I suspect, has anybody else, with the possible exception of >> amicus_curious. But in the sample that I did read, I have not seen Rjack >> ever specify exactly what in the GPL is illegal. For a short while I >> thought he was referring to antitrust, but not, he said he was not. >> >> Has anybody seen any specific description from Rjack in his posts that >> tells us what in the GPL is illegal? > > I killfiled Rjack shortly after his first message showed up. I have no > idea what he's yammering on about
Sound's about right. You certainly didn't have a clue about UI consistency and made yourself look pretty ignorant there. So same there then? -- In view of all the deadly computer viruses that have been spreading lately, Weekend Update would like to remind you: when you link up to another computer, you’re linking up to every computer that that computer has ever linked up to. — Dennis Miller _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
