On Tue, 5 May 2009 13:01:41 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out > this bit o' wisdom: > >> On Tue, 5 May 2009 07:13:19 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> >>> Nice summary of standard legal procedure, corner cases, and descriptions of >>> uninformed people. >>> >>> You know, the tip-of-the-iceberg stuff that people focus on for purposes of >>> FUD, while the vast majority /depend/ on the GPL. >> >> None of which supports Alan's argument that nobody can honestly >> misunderstand the GPL. > > Nobody can honestly not understand the main meanings of the GPL. > > That being said, version 3 is a bit more difficult to follow.
ahh.. now you move the goalpost.. the "main meaning". The main meaning is certainly clear, but the details are where the trouble lies, and where most people don't understand or interpret differently. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
