Erik Funkenbusch wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2009 13:01:41 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out >> this bit o' wisdom: >> >>> On Tue, 5 May 2009 07:13:19 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Nice summary of standard legal procedure, corner cases, and >>>> descriptions of uninformed people. >>>> >>>> You know, the tip-of-the-iceberg stuff that people focus on for >>>> purposes of FUD, while the vast majority /depend/ on the GPL. >>> >>> None of which supports Alan's argument that nobody can honestly >>> misunderstand the GPL. >> >> Nobody can honestly not understand the main meanings of the GPL. >> >> That being said, version 3 is a bit more difficult to follow. > > ahh.. now you move the goalpost.. the "main meaning". The main meaning > is certainly clear, but the details are where the trouble lies, and > where most people don't understand or interpret differently.
You want to tell us with a straight face that those people are unable to read the GPL FAQ? Really? Must all be wintendo fanbois like you and Hadron Snot Quark. Only those lack the necessary braincells -- To start your shiny new Pentium IV in Gameboy mode just enter C:\win _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
