In article <[email protected]>, Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many > people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests > best.
I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL? There are a fair number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF) who think Linus does *not* understand GPL. -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
