After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many
>> people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests
>> best.
>
> I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether
> or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL? There are a fair
> number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF)
> who think Linus does *not* understand GPL.
Which version of the GPL?
In any case, my statement still stands, and is proven by history, not
opinion.
--
Every why hath a wherefore.
-- William Shakespeare, "A Comedy of Errors"
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
