Rjack wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o' >> wisdom: >> >>> Writing source code that can call functions from a library does >>> not involve copying the library. >> >> No, but linking to it does. > > The GPL *allows* a library to be loaded into memory and subsequently > executed (i.e. glibc.so.xxx). So how does "linking" (call [a routine] > and return) to that code violate anything? >
Oh, that poor dimwitted RJack at his lost cause again. Ever heard of that special exceptions clause in the GPL concerning system libraries? -- Law of Probable Dispersal: Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
