Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Lack of virality regarding compilations is explicitly covered
> by "mere aggregation
This is false, of course, as any normal person reading the licenses can see. Choosing to deliberately misread a license isn't even any good for arguing on Usenet, much less forming a basis from which to run a software business. > The FSF is on record Once again, you are deliberately misstating what the FSF said, which was that GPLed programs contained on a Linux distribution medium fell under the "mere aggregation" clause and did not cause the distribution medium as whole to fall under the GPL. They made no such statement regarding programs built with GPLed components, since in fact this is the opposite of what the GPL states. Do you truly believe you gain some rhetorical advantage by outright lies? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
