Hadron <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > >> That has nothing whatsoever to do with "loopholes" or "complexity" in >> the GPL. It has to do with non-free software. >> >> The FSF stuck to its principles, and the makers of Qt decided to release >> it under a free license after all. >> >> Where is your problem with that? > > he didn't say he had a problem. He said its not as clear cut as you > make it out.
He only says that to annoy, because he knows it teases. > As even you must realise by now because of the size of the threads and > the fact you need to keep explaining things. Where is the point in letting the deliberate liars run the show? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
