In article <[email protected]>, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The KDE developers were operating in good faith when they dynamically > > linked to non-GPL Qt. This is allowed under GPLv2, because Qt was > > something normally distributed with the components of the operating > > system on which KDE ran. > > > > But the FSF threw a fit over this, until the makers of Qt changed the > > license. > > Huh? Qt was not merely licensed "non-GPL" but non-free. KDE relied on
It was not non-free. -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
