Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/19/2010 3:26 PM, RJack wrote:
For one wrongly decided non-precedential case:
Court vs. crank again.
How many times have you been told that unverifiable settlement
agreements are imaginary?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlement_%28litigation%29> The
settlement of the lawsuit defines legal requirements of the parties,
and is often put in force by an order of the court after a joint
stipulation by the parties. In other situations (as where the claims
have been satisfied by the payment of a certain sum of money) the
plaintiff and defendant can simply file a notice that the case has
been dismissed
Sorry Hyman. Unverifiable settlement agreements are illusory.
Claim all the unverifiable agreements you wish Hyman. People
are not foolish enough to prove a negative. If you claim a settlement
agreement then you produce it. Bullshit walks and money talks.
"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php
ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
