David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Well, if the GPLed source is made available in the aftermath, it stands
How do you know that, silly dak? Because "the version numbers on the links match," right you retard? Given that comrade Hyman is "insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." LOL why don't YOU dak go and try make a test trying to create http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp binary from the source tarball available on the actiontec's site dak? Please report back to us your results and evidence that the said source code is "complete corresponding source code under the GPL." TIA. regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
