Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> Well, if the GPLed source is made available in the aftermath, it stands > > How do you know that, silly dak? > > Because "the version numbers on the links match," right you retard?
I answered that already. There is nothing to be gained by fraudulently claiming to provide the correct source when this isn't the case: willful fraud is punished harder than accidental(?) non-adherence to license terms. If somebody needs the source for some purpose, he'll notice when it doesn't work, and it is unlikely that a court would find that funny. And if nobody needs the source, providing it can't do the business any harm. So there just is no point to fraud. Now while you delight in fantasizing about people just pretending to heed the GPL, that certainly is your prerequisite, but it certainly does not make you look smarter or saner than what you choose to call people. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
