RJack <u...@example.net> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> RJack <u...@example.net> writes: >> >>> That's a really brilliant tautology. "If I never use the GPL then >>> the Supreme Court ruling doesn't apply"! Clever. Really clever. >> >> You are getting this backwards. The Supreme Court talks about >> non-parties here. If you, as recipient of software, don't make use >> of the GPL, you are a non-party. So the Supreme Court ruling >> concerning non-parties _does_ apply, and you are not bound by the >> terms of the GPL. If you, however, make use of the GPL, you become a >> party of the license agreement. > > Who am I supposed to believe? You or my lyin' eyes? ROFL.
I think that the lying happens later in the processing chain. Anyway, if you have access to a brain, I recommend that you switch it on. That way, you avoid the need to believe anybody else. > Sincerely, Unlikely. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
