On 4/12/2010 12:43 PM, RJack wrote:
Your cited case is about statutes of limitations in compilations
Regardless of what the case is about, it is nevertheless a fact that the court stated <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane> McFarlane’s registrations no more revealed an intent to claim copyright in Gaiman’s contributions, as distinct from McFarlane’s own contributions as compiler and illustrator, than the copyright notices did. The significance of registration is that it is a prerequisite to a suit to enforce a copyright. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
