On 4/12/2010 7:45 AM, RJack wrote:
It claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem.
> Who are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes?
The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading the complaint, <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>. Since you continue to state something that is obviously untrue, as can be seen in the document, it is you who is lying. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
