On 4/12/2010 7:45 AM, RJack wrote:
It claims infringement of "BusyBox v. 0.60.3" causes the problem.
> Who are people going to believe? You or their lyin' eyes?

The SFLC does not claim that BusyBox v. 0.60.3 causes the
infringement problem. This can easily be seen by reading
the complaint,
Since you continue to state something that is obviously
untrue, as can be seen in the document, it is you who
is lying.
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to