Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> Yup. That's what makes the GPL relevant if you want to copy or >> distribute when you have no other permission from the rights holder. > > "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each > claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ > claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the provisions > of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any copies alleged > to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "
Nice try, but let's the court rule that this "twelfth" defense (quite late in the stack) is not utter nonsense before getting all excited. Of course, once a ruling is in (if defendents don't fold prior to that and get into compliance) you'll start your "the judges must have been drunk" bluster that does not stop when a higher court rules the same. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
