RJack <u...@example.net> writes:

> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>> On 4/13/2010 9:34 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>>> It's easy to read the first-sale doctrine, but fortunately it
>>>> does not apply to the copying and distribution carried out by the
>>>> defendants in this case.
>>> Sez who?
>> The GPL, of course, which does not allow copying and distribution of
>> covered works without compliance.
> The GPL allows copying and distribution through promissory estoppel.

It would be quite hard to figure out a deceptively suggested promise
that a defendant could claim to have relied on.

The GPL is very clear in its conditions, permissions and implications.

David Kastrup
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to