David Kastrup wrote: [...] > The GPL legally establishes a heterogenuos pool of software.
Hey dak, how come that the FSF claimed in court that the GPL is NOT A POOLING LICENSE (and is merely "a vertical agreement between the licensee and the licensor of the underlying software" instead)? <chuckles> http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_FSF_37.pdf regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
