Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 4/20/2010 1:25 PM, RJack wrote: > > There is *no* legal definition of what an "open" license is > > Open licenses authorize actions otherwise prohibited by copyright > law provided that persons using this authorization comply with > provisions specified by the license. The licenses are open in the
Do you really think that proprietary licenses authorize actions prohibited by copyright law provided that persons using this authorization NOT comply with provisions specified by the license, you idiot Hyman? What was your next assertion, you retard? regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
