Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > Here we disagree. GNU is not developed in a cave
Yes, thanks to a RMSʼs wise decision not to mix development of GNU with Church of Emacs — a decision you are now trying hard to revise and drive GNU into a cave where all contributors have to live on “their own dog food”. You presumably believe, that a relatively high number of Church of Emacs followers among GNU developers is an achievement, that GNU should be proud of. No, itʼs a shame that GNU is not able to attract a wide range of contributors by non-ideological reasons — just like other free and ‘open source’ software do. Much more of a shame than ‘unable to attract women’ of yours¹. > We have a public role, and whenever we go to conferences or hacker meetings, > we get an opportunity to lead by example. > And I definitely do not need any official validation to do that. You do not, yet others do? ;-) Otherwise, why these ‘contracts’? - ¹ By the way, it had been mentioned numerous times as a well-known fact, yet no any references were cited, is there any?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
