I understand your concern, but consider this: we are a group of GNU maintainers setting up a service for use by GNU maintainers to work on GNU. In that sense, I think itâs fair to say weâre not misusing the name.
You are misusing the trust given by the GNU project by harvesting member information and using it for non-GNU purposes. Nobody gave you the right to use that information, in any shape or form. I think this should eventually become wiki.gnu.org or meta.gnu.org because thatâs where it belongs. It hasnât been possible yet (we asked GNU sysadmins and the FSF), but Iâm sure weâll get there. The idea of a GNU wiki has been already rejected. The social contract you suggest has also been rejected, simply because we do not nor will we require members to accept such a document when they become GNU maintainers or volunteers.