It is infact beyond clear, specially from a group insisting on calling something "the GNU foobar", when that foobar has been rejected. It would be trivial for the people wanting this to call it something else.
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... fredomatic
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Jean Louis
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Carlo Wood
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Mark Wielaard
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Ruben Safir
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... DJ Delorie
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of t... Andreas R.
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 ... DJ Delorie
- Re: Endorsing version... Andreas R.
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of t... Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... Jean Louis
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social... Daniel Pocock
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... John Darrington
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)
- Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Con... fredomatic
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU S... Mark Wielaard
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the G... Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of t... Alexandre François Garreau
- Re: Endorsing version 1.0 ... Ruben Safir