> I think this is a very good idea actually - I'd go as far to say it would
> be simplest if we restrict submissions to Mutopia to one of three licenses:
>
> 1) Public Domain (already being used - must be used if music is entirely
> out of copyright)
> 2) A BSD Style license which we write and put on the website
> 3) A copyleft license (still to be decided)
>
> This makes it easier for submitters (they don't have to make up their own
> BSD Style license if they want to use one) and people downloading the music
> (they can see clearly from the table of music exactly which license is
> being used). Does this make sense?
I kind of agree that it's practical to have a few standard formulations.
However, there are cases where it might be necessary to add some
extra lines. One example is a score I typeset where the library owning
the manuscript requested that they would be acknowledged in the
edition.
/Mats
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Werner Icking
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Peter Chubb
- Re: Mutopia License: Choral Public Domai... David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: Choral Public D... David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Werner Icking
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Mats Bengtsson
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Michael Ossmann
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Alain CULOS
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style licen... Alain CULOS
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Romain d'Alverny
