Em Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:24:31 -0500
[email protected] (Alfred M. Szmidt) escreveu:
> As I can see it, the only "effort" missing is the GNU project
> declaring that this is the official GNU system.
>
> Exactly, and that isn't a high priority (for the project as a whole --
> we all have our own priorities) -- making one more non-free program
> is.
I don't know what's the real reason backing RMS's decision of not
declaring it the GNU system yet. However I *do* know that what you are
stating is clearly not the real reason. As noted by some colleagues,
you are conflating FSF and GNU project's roles.
> Personally, I would be very sad to see a release of the GNU system
> that does not allow a user the same technical freedoms as the Hurd
> provides. But that is another topic, biased by history.
To say you would be *very happy* to see a release of the GNU system
that allows a user the same technical freedoms as the Hurd provides is
laudable. Stating what you've stated is what, in fact, is *very sad*.
--
,= ,-_-. =. Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
((_/)o o(\_)) There is no system but GNU;
`-'(. .)`-' GNU Linux-Libre is one of its official kernels;
\_/ All software must be free as in freedom;
