On Sunday 15 April 2012, al davis wrote: > Maybe even ... > > module RESISTOR (\2, \1); > parameter real r; > resistor #(.r(r)) R1 (\2, \1); > endmodule > > This isn't the permanent answer because it adds another level > of indirection, but maybe it will provide some insight.
I think the answer is "macromodule". In the standard, section 6.2, it says .... "The keyword macromodule can be used interchangeably with the keyword module to define a module. An implementation may choose to treat module definitions beginning with the macromodule keyword differently." In Ken Kundert's book, page 226, he says: "An implementation can choose to flatten the hierarchy of macromodules for efficiency". In this case, what would be required is a simple substitution, where to flatten obviously what is needed. A set of these macros could be in an include file that maps to a particular symbol library. _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
