On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:11 PM, John Griessen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 11:47 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote: > >> I was wondering about why anyone would want to use gnetlist, when gnucap >> can read the geda/gschem netlists. >> > > geda/gschem netlists come from gnetlist. > I think Felix meant .. when gnucap can read gschem schematics... > > We will use gnetlist for future hierarchy uses as in verilog-a gnetlist > back end, > and to not limit applications of gschem. > > gschem will change. I see gschem handling symbol instances in a year. > > gnucap will change. QUCS will change. > > verilog-a is a precise standard we can use a particular version > of to good benefit. Yes I agree. Verilog is well documented and versatile than spice format. > And lastly, one uses gnetlist to make flat netlists for PCB production as a > subset. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Gnucap-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/**listinfo/gnucap-devel<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel> > -- Savant Krishna | Sophomore | Electrical Engineering | IIT Bombay _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
