Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anyone mind if we stick with GIF, at least until we (sometime in
> > the long-term future) replace gtkxmhtml with the new gtkhtml?
>
> Well, I obviously didn't see this thread before I sent my previous
> message about pngs :>
>
> How bad would it be if we used uncompressed gifs? I suspect it
> wouldn't be tenable, but I figured I'd ask.
>
> Barring that, what's preventing us from switching to the new gtkhtml?
> I haven't been following the development on that front.
>
As far as I know, there is no such thing as an uncompressed GIF, since
the LZW compression algorithm is an integral and non-optional part of
the GIF format.
--
=======================================================================
| Dr. James E. Fowler |
| Assistant Professor |
| Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering |
| Mississippi State University |
| |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| |
---------- Postal Address ---------------------- Contact Info ---------
| Box 9571, 216 Simrall | Phone: (662)325-3640 |
| Mississippi State, MS 39762 | Fax: (662)325-2298 |
| USA | Office: Rm. 406 Simrall |
=======================================================================
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
