On 11 Feb 2000 18:54:26 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It would *significantly* increase the size of the tarball.
>
> Given what Dave said about gtkhtml, it looks like for now we're either
> going to have to use jpegs, live with GIF's, or use uncompressed
> GIF's.
Tell me I'm dumb, or wouldn't it be the case that uncompressed GIFs
would be, *in raw form,* pretty large, and, since they haven't been
compressed, fairly readily compressed when in tarball form?
--
"He who writes the code gets to choose his license, and nobody else
gets to complain." -- Linus Torvalds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - - <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
