Rob Browning writes:
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anyone mind if we stick with GIF, at least until we (sometime in
> > the long-term future) replace gtkxmhtml with the new gtkhtml?
>
> Well, I obviously didn't see this thread before I sent my previous
> message about pngs :>
>
> How bad would it be if we used uncompressed gifs? I suspect it
> wouldn't be tenable, but I figured I'd ask.
>
It would *significantly* increase the size of the tarball.
> Barring that, what's preventing us from switching to the new gtkhtml?
> I haven't been following the development on that front.
I don't know. There's two issues here, as I see it:
1) The maturity of gtkhtml, considering we'll hopefully make a
stable release in the not-too-distant future :)
2) The amount of work that gnucash needs to make the change.
I'll try to find out an answer to 1) today. AFAIK, 2) is relatively
small, but I didn't write the code so somebody else will have to
answer that question.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
-- WOP, "War Games"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
