On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:18:50PM -0500, David Hampton wrote: | On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 18:16 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: | | > I've been thinking | > about just how bad it would look/feel if the register-gnome was just "raw" | > gtk layout-managers + widgets ... but any experiments I was thinking of | > performing along those lines would be after the gnome2 port is completed. | | I had been planning to try and rewrite the register as a GtkTreeView | once the gnome2 port is done. ISTR there was some reason why I needed | gtk-2.4 instead of 2.2, but the reason eludes me at the moment.
The GtkAction stuff, I'd imagine. At this point, we can probably un-egg it and just claim 2.4 as a straight dep, given it's been out since March and the g2 port won't be done for a couple/few more months... ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/jsled/ _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
