On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:18:50PM -0500, David Hampton wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 18:16 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > > I've been thinking > > about just how bad it would look/feel if the register-gnome was just "raw" > > gtk layout-managers + widgets ... but any experiments I was thinking of > > performing along those lines would be after the gnome2 port is completed. > > I had been planning to try and rewrite the register as a GtkTreeView > once the gnome2 port is done. ISTR there was some reason why I needed > gtk-2.4 instead of 2.2, but the reason eludes me at the moment.
I don't want to take your project (esp. when there's so much to do), but I'll say that I think that your plan would probably result in fewer register bugs in g2. -chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
