On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 02 September 2013 19:48:48 Christian Stimming wrote: >> John Ralls <[email protected]> schrieb: >>> BZ has an enormous number of old target versions which makes for very >>> long lists when picking. I just modified all of the already-released >>> versions to sort to the bottom, but would anything bad happen if I >>> just deleted all previous releases? None of them are in use. >> >> In use by currently open bugs, you mean? Unfortunately bugzilla won't >> allow to delete old versions if there are closed bugs on them. I >> think that's why this list grows larger and larger... Actually, it says there are bugs entered for the milestone and that deleting it will retarget them to ---. I think that's fine; I can't see any reason to look at old roadmaps. >>> Similarly I'd like to clean out the "version" list as well to include >>> only those versions which have bugs on them (which includes every >>> release from 2.2.0 on. I propose to consolidate all of the 2.0 and >>> 2.3 releases into 2.0.x and 2.3.x respectively. >>> >>> Any objections or concerns? >> >> All consolidation that is possible technically is fine with me. > > +1 I see that 1.9 also needs compressing. I'll start in on that soon. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
