On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 02 September 2013 19:48:48 Christian Stimming wrote: >> John Ralls <[email protected]> schrieb: >>> BZ has an enormous number of old target versions which makes for very >>> long lists when picking. I just modified all of the already-released >>> versions to sort to the bottom, but would anything bad happen if I >>> just deleted all previous releases? None of them are in use. >> >> In use by currently open bugs, you mean? Unfortunately bugzilla won't >> allow to delete old versions if there are closed bugs on them. I >> think that's why this list grows larger and larger... >>> Similarly I'd like to clean out the "version" list as well to include >>> only those versions which have bugs on them (which includes every >>> release from 2.2.0 on. I propose to consolidate all of the 2.0 and >>> 2.3 releases into 2.0.x and 2.3.x respectively. >>> >>> Any objections or concerns? >> >> All consolidation that is possible technically is fine with me. > > +1 Still feel that way after a few *thousand* bug-mails? It's done for now: I left 2.2.9 as a separate version because we do occasionally get reports against it. All of the old milestones have been deleted as well, and I corrected 2.5.4 to 2.5.5, which is the next release, and added 2.5.6. I also moved all of the open bugs in 2.5.x to 2.6.0 and deleted 2.5.x as a milestone--we'll never do a 2.5.x release. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
