On Tuesday 03 September 2013 17:33:50 John Ralls wrote: > On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Monday 02 September 2013 19:48:48 Christian Stimming wrote: > >> John Ralls <[email protected]> schrieb: > >>> BZ has an enormous number of old target versions which makes for > >>> very > >>> long lists when picking. I just modified all of the > >>> already-released > >>> versions to sort to the bottom, but would anything bad happen if I > >>> just deleted all previous releases? None of them are in use. > >> > >> In use by currently open bugs, you mean? Unfortunately bugzilla > >> won't > >> allow to delete old versions if there are closed bugs on them. I > >> think that's why this list grows larger and larger... > >> > >>> Similarly I'd like to clean out the "version" list as well to > >>> include > >>> only those versions which have bugs on them (which includes every > >>> release from 2.2.0 on. I propose to consolidate all of the 2.0 and > >>> 2.3 releases into 2.0.x and 2.3.x respectively. > >>> > >>> Any objections or concerns? > >> > >> All consolidation that is possible technically is fine with me. > > > > +1 > > Still feel that way after a few *thousand* bug-mails? > I only got about 250 :)
> It's done for now: I left 2.2.9 as a separate version because we do > occasionally get reports against it. All of the old milestones have > been deleted as well, and I corrected 2.5.4 to 2.5.5, which is the > next release, and added 2.5.6. I also moved all of the open bugs in > 2.5.x to 2.6.0 and deleted 2.5.x as a milestone--we'll never do a > 2.5.x release. > Thanks for the housekeeping. Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
