Hi Alen, > The description is something for me (the user) to add notes about the > transaction and is basically irrelevant for anyone else
we might argue about that. I find it at least inconsistent since the transaction description is in fact protected by the reconciliation of a single split. Cheers, Christoph > Am 28.03.2018 um 15:54 schrieb Alen Siljak <alen.sil...@gmx.com>: > > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 3:46 PM >> From: "Christoph R" <subscriptions+lis...@rohland.net> >> To: gnucash-devel <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> >> Subject: Feedback about 2.7.8 >> But I can change the description of a reconciled split without a warning. I >> need to file a bug report on that. > > Chris, I'm just wondering - why would a change of description require > re-reconciliation? > Somehow, I'd expect that the date and amount are the relevant fields. The > description is something for me (the user) to add notes about the transaction > and is basically irrelevant for anyone else, therefore not requiring > re-reconciliation with another account statement (i.e. bank or credit card > statement). Just wondering what your case is. > > Cheers, > > Alen _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
