GnuCash Developers and Maintainers:
  Hello! While you have mentioned the requirement of human intervene in the 
reconciliation process, I do not see it contradicts with the presence of 
automatically reconciliation system.
  In a reconcile process, the accountant check the record in the account book 
with the record in the bank statement (or statement from other institution). He 
(or she) may found out that two record are identical, or he (or she) may found 
that some record are not identical. Only the latter requires human notice, 
since there its no point wasting time on reconciled accounting transactions. An 
automatic reconciliation system can load the digital statement from the 
institution, compares the statement with the transaction in the accounting 
book, and pinpoints the discrepancies out. Then human accountant could step in 
and perform manual operations, such as checking other vouchers, contact with 
banks, etc. In the situation of single user, the automatic reconcile system 
have no reason to block manual reconciliation.
  Besides, when I means "human err", I means that the accountant overlook an 
discrepancy and regards it as identical. People do not spend too much time on identical 
records, since major of the transaction would be in that state. However, it could cause 
severe consequences if there do have a discrepancy.
  Yours,

 Bite, Gao
Jan 6th, 2023

On 2023/1/5 12:03, Liz Dodd Wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 15:42:41 +0800
Bite Gao<redfrog2...@outlook.com>  wrote:

    GnuCash Developers and Maintainers:
       Hello! While your software has done many tedious jobs previously
    done by
    accountants manually, it cannot automatically reconcile its
accounting data
    to the bank statement in its digital form. In my opinion, the
    automation of
    reconciliation is not only efficient but also accurate since it
reduces human-caused errors.
       I would appreciate you a lot if you could add an
auto-reconciliation function to your software.
       Yours,
      Bite Gao
    Jan 4th, 2023
Bite, this is an interesting idea, but to me reconciliation requires
human input.
While I manually reconcile, I have to attend to pending transactions,
for example a payment made on a card which never is taken from the bank
account. At what time do I take that from the active list? Where will I
put the the never finished transactions?

A number which is different in my list to the banks? How will I check
for the correct number? When do I contact the bank?

They are human decisions, different in each jurisdiction.
They are the reason I reconcile - not to have my numbers the same as
the banks, but to see the discrepancies and decide on an action.

Could you please describe more what you want from automated
reconciliation? Your statement about "human-caused errors" implies that
reconciliation introduces errors rather than highlights them.


Liz
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to