On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 11:43 -0400, Michael or Penny Novack wrote: > A good, clear example why something like that should be allowed.
Been watching the replies to this with interest: there's a lot of knowledge out there. But, thinking about it, the problem that I ran across was that the two splits in the offending transaction had ended up with a CR and a DB for the same amount to the same account; it was a null transaction. I hesitate to say this, having been proved thoroughly wrong before, but surely there can't be a reason to want a transaction like that? -- -- Henry Law n e w s @ l a w s h o u s e . o r g Manchester, England _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
