Did you check the time settings? If you don't give it enough time it will play at a weaker playing level. You can see that because the level number on the computer button will change.
David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David G Doshay > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 6:32 PM > To: GNU Go development > Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] 3.4 vs 3.6 against MFG > > > On 7, Mar 2005, at 4:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I wonder if your copy of Many Faces is somehow > > broke. For example, look at move 104 in the last game, > throwing away > > the corner. (B still has a chance to live at move 110.) > > > > Yes, GNU Go sometimes makes moves that are just as > > bad as this when the owl code misfires. But on the > > whole this B doesn't seem to play as positively as > > usual from Many Faces. It seems to have a different > > style than I expect. Does it have a version number? > > 11.0 > > On 7, Mar 2005, at 5:04 PM, Douglas Ridgway wrote: > > > > Very interesting! Do you have any data on H0 with GNU Go playing > > white? I > > seem to recall that it did worse with white than black. > > I guess I could run another set of games like that, but no, > we do not have that now. > > > > And are you by any chance using the fuseki db patches I > posted back in > > November / December? It's not been added, I believe due to concerns > > about how much disk space it will occupy, but the additional > > variability should > > be particularly important for running lots of games for testing and > > statistics. For me, this was in fact the main point of the new db. > > GNU Go was just the release version 3.6 with no patches. > > > Cheers, > David > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gnugo-devel mailing list > [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel > _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
