At 10:50 AM +1000 9/19/05, Horst Herb wrote:
Don't think of it as a diagnosis then, think of it as a problem list.
How else would you be able to quickly browse a patient's history if encounters
weren't labelled with something meaningful?
Even if you have ten encounters labelled as "vague unspecific symptoms" it is
most helpful, because then really alarm bells should ring - whereas 10
unlabelled episodes are far less likely to draw your attention
Horst, in your mini-gnumed is each of your visit SOAP notes a single
row in a clinical notes table?
And how are your many-to-one relationships between multiple problems,
and a particular progress note, stored in the mini-gnumed backend? I
don't believe GNUmed proper, as its schema is currently defined,
would support that (?)
Karsten, are these approaches (current GNUmed vs Horst's in which a
single note record can be linked to multiple problems) incompatible
in the same schema?
_______________________________________________
Gnumed-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
