On 3/23/19 2:43 PM, Christian Grothoff wrote: > On 3/22/19 7:40 PM, amirouche wrote: >> >> >> It would rely on GNS and a TXT record to publish the gnunet fs URI of a >> map of the >> database of meme each identity or ego published. Think of this as some >> kind web >> sitemap.xml. > > Please do NOT use a TXT record. This part of what you describe fits what > I had in mind for GNS/FS integration, but I would define a new record > type, say GNUNET-FSURI or something like that.
Clarification/correction: we should probably call it GNUNET_FS_CHK or something like that and NOT make it a URI but the binary encoding of the information encoded in a FS URI. That's more efficient, and we can still define the human-readable FS-URI encoding for the text representation. That way we gain ~2x efficiency on the network, and the usability stays pretty much the same. > It's pretty easy to add > new record types to GNS, we don't need IETF approval, and we have 4 > billion values available. So no reason to overload TXT like it is done > in DNS. We can do better ;-). > > If you need help defining a new record type (the process for how to do > this should be documented reasonably well in the manual), don't hesitate > to ask! > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
