On 3/24/19 9:37 AM, IC Rainbow wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 4:44 PM Christian Grothoff > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Please do NOT use a TXT record. This part of what you describe fits what >> I had in mind for GNS/FS integration, but I would define a new record >> type, say GNUNET-FSURI or something like that. It's pretty easy to add >> new record types to GNS, we don't need IETF approval, and we have 4 >> billion values available. So no reason to overload TXT like it is done >> in DNS. We can do better ;-). > > Can we also have types for CADET ports and other major parts/services > of GNUnet base package?
A CADET port itself is not so useful, you'd need the combination of peer ID + CADET port. So if you have an application that runs some service on such a CADET port, it would indeed make sense to define a record type for that particular application containing the PID+PORT. _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
