On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 4:44 PM Christian Grothoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please do NOT use a TXT record. This part of what you describe fits what > I had in mind for GNS/FS integration, but I would define a new record > type, say GNUNET-FSURI or something like that. It's pretty easy to add > new record types to GNS, we don't need IETF approval, and we have 4 > billion values available. So no reason to overload TXT like it is done > in DNS. We can do better ;-). Can we also have types for CADET ports and other major parts/services of GNUnet base package? _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
