On 9/7/19 9:00 PM, N wrote: >> Sure, assuming you're talking about using Florian's uncrustify style. > > Oh? I thought we would be using clang-format. > Do you know how much it differs in style? I've used > clang-format in my hook. I can run uncrustify on the > tree.
Given that uncrustify looks significantly better -- and also offers some more flexibility (i.e. "leave as is") I think we should just go for uncrustify _exclusively_.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
