ok. I've never seen the email by florian which christian mentioned to me. I'm okay with uncrustify.
Should I wait for more of us to reply or get to it today? Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 2.5K bytes: > Fine with me. I just tried it. Works great in vim just like clang-format. > > > On 8. Sep 2019, at 05:45, Christian Grothoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Signed PGP part > > On 9/7/19 9:00 PM, N wrote: > >>> Sure, assuming you're talking about using Florian's uncrustify style. > >> > >> Oh? I thought we would be using clang-format. > >> Do you know how much it differs in style? I've used > >> clang-format in my hook. I can run uncrustify on the > >> tree. > > > > Given that uncrustify looks significantly better -- and also offers some > > more flexibility (i.e. "leave as is") I think we should just go for > > uncrustify _exclusively_. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
