On 8 Jul 2011, at 17:31, David Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. Note that the list-packets output shows the internal packed value: > 6553600 should come out to 201. The default of 65536 would encode to 96.
I do indeed get 201. Out of interest, how is that calculated? I also changed the digest algorithm to SHA512; the iter+salt line shows this, but still mentions SHA1 protection. Am I right in thinking that this means SHA1 is always used as a kind of checksum for the passphrase (only that and a simple checksum being specified by RFC4880), but the passphrase itself is stored as a SHA512 digest after 6553600 iterations of the hash function? Cheers Chris _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
