On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:24:38AM -0700, Schlacta, Christ wrote: > I'll reiterate that there's really no such thing as unwanted signatures. > The more signatures on a key, the stronger the Web of Trust. End of story. > Please try to understand that no signature is inherently unwanted. Your > proposal, in any form, would weaken gpg on the whole by increasing the > already high burden on users to maintain their keys.
With all due respect, but why should a GnuPG user not been allowed to decide by him/herself which signatures he/she likes to have on his/her pub key? I don't get it, seriously. BTW. maybe a language barrier, but an unwanted signature for me is a signature which contains crap or false content which does not help the Web of Trust in any way and which i or others don't like to see on our public keys. P.S. last post for today, getting late here. Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
