-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 16 August 2015 at 6:15:16 PM, in <mid:20150816171516.9276343...@smtp.hushmail.com>, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > This would require the owners of the keys to do > periodic checking of their keys and cross-certify the > signatures they want. Why bother periodically checking? If somebody doesn't have the courtesy to send the signature to the key owner rather than publishing it themselves, they shouldn't expect the key owner to cross-certify it. > The implementers can best decide how much extra work > this would require, and if there is a simpler better > way to accomplish the desired result. The "keyserver no-modify" flag was simple. But it didn't achieve the desired result. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> The second mouse gets the cheese -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJV0RSHXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwP00H+wf3fJ5febGlQixq2npTGVa2 PqQL8Ipr1202a9PUS/milX0VJL/pb3a9JoKMNlp0g91HktedcxU+ageqhZYWD+d9 NtymQfnyrHk7jwHM6SJFhEo5t9/ZzIsmqaqnXBglrg3a7mj2fcfNe7N5wkn52MFJ 0GtgE2NM1WcHgv0EaJkjAj8JnB1eU+liOAz773/yUCf99IK7yv4hTVTAKQq4ElhV 6ZiBjYLOWXAhTCSVp0H/U8j7WnN2xrrSfiC7o9xCOsXkqjtoDoVyrkzmffl/zbkX VCkwYoLdPh23Noe+QxB/Q9dVz7GiB7kcUFcycvJQbzDLqif2kZ96J6wXfmaW+jaI vgQBFgoAZgUCVdEUjF8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45P97AQCS0hy8ocOPOYCXN/xnkSnwxRZG W6Pr/INQ7c6/0NR7HwEAxqFjpYel0Xb38bRZk+kwm1wayjEBOARTMTbYzcI5SQE= =+DOC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users