On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote: > state? (Sorry, but I also find it rather ironic/funny that erast needs > to use SXCE to build nexenta core)
It is ironic. And I said it to you before - it is just luck of interest/time of the community in making the procedure more clean. I think nexenta-on source package is a first step in the right direction. We soon should have it fully build-able out of "apt-get source -b". > For the other part of this email.. I'm sure many people appreciate > trying to get new developers interested with small cash rewards, but > unless you're offering chunks like gsoc I'm not sure it'll really > attract much attention. (I could be wrong) Just a thought.. What about > actually trying to push some sort of innovation? I know you guys have > some CIFS workgroup patches that are interesting, but what else is > Nexenta really doing? I don't mean this sarcastically, but why should > anyone even really care? If you say Solaris kernel + ubuntu/debian > userland.. I'm going to laugh.. The fact that Nexenta exists is innovation by itself. I.e. distribution of major UNIX kernel driven by Debian-like policy and OpenSource philosophy. We are getting there. The reason Nexenta exists is primarily because of people who loves Debian principals and technical ideas. I'd like to thank all the contributors and welcome new ones! Nexenta Hackathon is a great opportunity for young developers to achieve their goals, I think. _______________________________________________ gnusol-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-users
